this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
-3 points (20.0% liked)

Politics

1025 readers
1 users here now

@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.

founded 2 years ago
 

The Michigan Supreme Court has rejected an attempt to remove former President Donald Trump from the 2024 ballot based on the US Constitution’s “insurrectionist ban.”

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So much for upholding the constitution, specifically the 14th Amendment. What good is it if not applied to insurrectionists?

The Michigan Court of Claims judge who first got the case said state law doesn’t give election officials any leeway to police the eligibility of presidential primary candidates. He also said the case raised a political question that shouldn’t be decided in the courts.
His decision was upheld by the Michigan Court of Appeals, which said: “At the moment, the only event about to occur is the presidential primary election. But as explained, whether Trump is disqualified is irrelevant to his placement on that particular ballot.”
The order from the Michigan Supreme Court was unsigned, and the court did not release a vote count.
Unlike in Colorado, the Michigan courts rejected the case wholly on procedural grounds. They never reached the questions of whether January 6 was an insurrection and whether Trump engaged in it.

Cowards, tacitly supporting anti-democratic fascism and not even signing their names to it.

[–] 800XL 2 points 10 months ago

I had such high hopes for Michigan with all of the changes they were making. This is so disappointing.

[–] chillhelm 1 points 10 months ago

But at this point trump is not running for an office of the United States. "Republican Nominee" is no official office. The Republican Primary in Michigan (or any other state) is not affected by the 14th amendment. They can put Arnold Schwarzenegger on there or Timothee Chalamet. Neither of which can legally become president (yet).

If the judges had found he can't stop Trump from being on the presidential ballot in Michigan, that would violate the 14th amendment.