Firefox

17952 readers

384 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

196

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 67 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No conflict of interest going on here guys

[–] TheTetrapod 26 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I mean, the fact they rolled it back and didn't just add an error message telling you to use Chrome is a little surprising.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Not really. They need FF to exist to avert monopoly accusations.

[–] nucleative 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

They need FF to exist.. But doesn't necessarily have to work well.

[–] frizop 3 points 6 months ago

This. It’s more like it existing in name is enough