this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
253 points (96.7% liked)
Games
16733 readers
796 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Don't count your hens I remember when all the consoles had backwards compatibility, until they didn't.
Every PlayStation generation had backwards compatibility followed quickly by a cheaper "slim" version without it.
The PS2 and PS5 slim versions didn't mess with backwards compatibility, just the PS3 ~~and PS4.~~
What backwards compatibility did the original PS4 have?
I just double checked, and it didn't have any, it looks like. So it's just the PS3 Slim that cut backwards compatibility.
As for why the PS4 wasn't backwards compatible with PS3 games, the PS3's architecture was hard to emulate and too expensive to include wholesale without ballooning the price beyond the target.
Thanks for the correction. I typically avoided the slim versions myself.