Programmer Humor

32558 readers

186 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

288

I mean at least they are honest? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 3 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure it is a thing but JavaScript on that domain can access it either injected or provided by the site. This is quite risky. Cookies can be http only so that client code cant access it.

[–] Zzombiee2361 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is storing hideCookieBanner: false on local storage risky?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What would the benefit of storing that in local storage?

[–] bighi 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Remembering that the user asked to not see that banner again.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why not just set a cookie?

[–] bighi 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because we were talking about how to save that information without using cookies. Setting a cookie would break the one thing that the conversation was about, wouldn't it?

If we're in a fun conversation about how to enter your home without using the door, would you be the one saying "I have an idea, I have an idea: use the door"?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It was clearly a reference to the so called 'cookie laws' requiring permission for tracking cookies. However, cookies that are not for tracking purposes do not require any form of consent.