this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
1550 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

59974 readers
3507 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
1550
FCC restores net neutrality rules that ban blocking and throttling in 3-2 vote (arstechnica.com)
submitted 7 months ago by ForgottenFlux to c/technology
159 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The Federal Communications Commission voted 3–2 to impose net neutrality rules today, restoring the common-carrier regulatory framework enforced during the Obama era and then abandoned while Trump was president.

The rules prohibit Internet service providers from blocking and throttling lawful content and ban paid prioritization.

"Consumers have made clear to us they do not want their broadband provider cutting sweetheart deals, with fast lanes for some services and slow lanes for others," FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel said at today's meeting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 73 points 7 months ago (15 children)

No reason they should exist in any day and age.

Companies do not pay per packet. Paying more for more bandwidth or lower latency kind of makes sense because theoretically they may be prioritizing your traffic when the network is under too much load. But sending 16 petabytes costs exactly the same as 1kb in a month, assuming your connection is fast enough to handle 16 petabytes in a month.

[–] LaLuzDelSol -2 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Right but if everyone sends 16 petabtyes a month the internet would collapse. Data caps do absolutely work to reduce bandwidth on a network scale. Bandwidth is measured in mbps. Limit the Mb and you reduce the necessary bandwidth.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

but if everyone sent 16PB a month they would have some bomb ass connections as well, and i would sure hope as hell that it would hold up.

I dont even want to calculate how fast a connection would need to be for that to be a datacap.

[–] uis 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

More than 6 gigabytes per second

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

ok so basically fucking impossible. Cool.

Even 10 gig would only net you 1 and a bit gigs.

You would need 50 gig to saturate that properly.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)