this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
1331 points (98.7% liked)

Comic Strips

11197 readers
2575 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/14465880

It's the endgame.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can you please elaborate on the technical details of the failures? What was the hidden dependency?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The ISP had redundant electrical grid connections for reliability, but the two connections were not isolated at the electrical utility level. A failure in one substation cascaded to the other substation. The operation of one electrical feed depended on the operation of the other, so they were effectively only a single feed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

But I don't understand why them being connected makes one dependent on the other, unless half of the supply alone can't support the workload. What is the "electrical utility level"

[–] gaiussabinus 1 points 2 months ago

Both substations feed in parallel. Demand exceeded the capacity of station 2 to supply demand and it tripped the cutout. Only rural connections are radial. Electrical utility starts at the point of demarcation to the generators that make the power.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

The "utility level" is Madison Gas & Electric's infrastructure. Our ISP had two independent electrical service connections based on the idea that if one went down, they'd still get power sufficient to run their data center from the other. That would be the case if each connection reached all the way to the generating station completely independently. However, the two substations to which the ISP was connected were linked in such a way that a catastrophic failure of one caused failure of the other, so it got no electrical power.