this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
22 points (100.0% liked)

main

1334 readers
38 users here now

Default community for midwest.social. Post questions about the instance or questions you want to ask other users here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
22
Meta's Threads.net (midwest.social)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Are we going to block Meta's Threads.net? I get it if people want to keep things open. However, Meta is a proven bad actor. They claim they didn't put in ActivityPub because it was too complicated to get it done at launch, and they can't get EU approval of their service because of the rampant and invasive data they gather. IMHO, they are going to attempt to muscle the fediverse out of the equation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@aberrate_junior_beatnik the headstart I was referring to was in developing the technology. As you pointed out it would be hypocritical to cite the fediverse user base as a draw to using ActivityPub while simultaneously downplaying the size of the user base as insignificant. Sorry I wasn't clear what I was referring to.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That makes no sense. It would be much faster to simply not federate.