this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
82 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

1453 readers
959 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/13875589

Ruling: Thumbprint scan is like a "blood draw or fingerprint taken at booking."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MapleEngineer 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Biometrics are ease of access, not security.  They make it easy for you (and low skilled strong arm attackers, skilled hackers, nation state actors, and neo-Nazi police state border and police thugs) to unlock your phone.  As long as you're good with making it easy for them to unlock your phone by all means, use biometrics.

Using biometrics to provide access to personal data is asinine.

Using biometrics to provide access to any amount of sensitive data is criminally negligent.

Biometrics cannot be changed.  Once you've given your palm biometrics, or facial biometrics, or fingerprints, or iris or retinal scans, or facial biometrics to any company or government they are no longer useful.

Just as the 5.6 million people whose fingerprints were lost in the OPM hack in 2015.

But whatever...you do you.  If you want to make it easy for people to access your device, go ahead and use biometrics.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It takes one button press and one tap to disable biometrics on my phone at which point it reverts to a strong password.

[–] trashgirlfriend 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

*Getting handcuffed*

"Hey officer can I press a couple buttons on my phone first? :)"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Lol if it takes until there's literal handcuffs on you, you're a little physically challenged. Not to mention the phone will auto lockdown after 24hrs. There's also nothing stopping you from initiating the lockdown if they were at the point of forcing you to open it.