this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
57 points (74.4% liked)

Technology

34995 readers
273 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Bing uses ChatGPT.

Despite using search results, it also hallucinates, like when it told me last week that IKEA had built a model of aircraft during World War 2 (uncited).

I was trying to remember the name of a well known consumer goods company that had made an aircraft and also had an aerospace division. The answer is Ball, the jar and soda can company.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I had it tell me a certain product had a feature it didn’t and then cite a website that was hosting a copy of the user manual… that didn’t mention said feature. Having it cite sources makes it way easier to double check if it’s spewing bullshit though

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Yes, but it shows how an LLM can combine its own AI with information taken from web searches.

The question I'm responding to was:

I wonder why nobody seems capable of making a LLM that knows how to do research and cite real sources.

And Bing Chat is one example of exactly that. It's not perfect, but I wasn't claiming it was. Only that it was an example of what the commenter was asking about.

As you pointed out, when it makes mistakes you can check them by following the citations it has provided.