this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
25 points (100.0% liked)
[Dormant] Electric Vehicles (Moved to [email protected])
3191 readers
1 users here now
We have moved to:
A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.
Rules
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No self-promotion.
- No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
- No trolling.
- Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Well the most important committed onboard party is Society of Automotive Engineers International. So it will be a real standard. Well atleast will be as long as Tesla agrees to the patent release. SAE doesn't allow undefined patent encurbements in technology on their standards. Tesla has to either issue Reasonable and Non-discriminatory patent license letter or Free of Charge, Reasonable and Non-discriminatory letter. The free of charge part is up to Teslas choice. Reasonable and non-discriminatory is not.
I would expect lot of brands to back out, if SAE cries foul on Tesla not being committed to standardisation. Then again I don't expect Tesla to back out. I'm sure lot of these super charger access and adoption deals by the big players have a "NACS gets officially standardised or we are out" clauses.