this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
80 points (95.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43899 readers
1505 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
80
Why doesn't NA beer have nutrition fact labels in the USA? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I understand that alcoholic beverages are regulated by the ATF and not the FDA, which is why nutrition fact labels aren't legally required on alcoholic beverages, but why does this carry over to NA beer?

It's basically just beer-flavored soda. It has less than the required alcohol content (<0.5%) to be legally classified as an alcoholic beverage. Is it not regulated by the FDA?

The only clue I have is that Nutrition Fact labels appear on cans of NA beer made by companies that only produce NA beer (e.g. Athletic / Partake), but not NA beers produced by existing full-alcohol breweries (e.g. Heineken / Guinness). Is there some sort of "we also produce alcoholic beverages" loophole to avoid FDA regulation?

If so, would it be possible for Coca-Cola, who distributes alcoholic beverages (e.g. Topo Chico hard seltzer / Jack & Coke premixed cocktails), to get around the requirement for their regular sodas?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sertou 19 points 7 months ago (2 children)

NA beer is not basically β€œbeer flavored soda.” The only thing the two have in common is carbonation and even that is produced differently in each. Soda is flavored syrup mixed with water that has been carbonated by forcing CO2 through it. NA beer is brewed the same as regular beer, and carbonation occurs during this process. For some NA beers, fermentation is arrested before significant amounts of alcohol form, while others are subjected to a vacuum to lower the boiling point so that the alcohol can be boiled out with a minimum effect of the flavor.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

This is it. The law is likely written in a way that exempts all non-alcoholic beer and the brewing industry doesn't want to touch that law at all since it would likely lead to all alcoholic products being required to publish nutritional information rather than just non-alcoholic products.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I think you are taking the beer flavored soda comment too literally.

Both are beverages people drink for fun and have calories, which is the comparison said in a lighthearted manner.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Except it depends on how the law sees them. OP may view them as two similar products, but the law may not and the discussion is based on why the law treats two similar products differently.