this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
444 points (91.0% liked)

Asklemmy

42434 readers
1263 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A few examples include s*x questions on askreddit, "this" comments, nolife powermods, jokes being more frequent than actual answers

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 60 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I think the whole "no life mods" thing got a bit overblown. Reddit communities flourished generally due to the ones that had good active moderation. Setting a consistent theme and tone for the subreddit and keeping the bad actors out. It takes a lot of work, they did it for free and we benefited.

The issue is when some people are mods for tons of major communities. That's when it is overreaching.

[โ€“] [email protected] 45 points 11 months ago (3 children)

/r/askhistorians had very strict mods and was better for it.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

yup. Good moderation makes or breaks the community.

[โ€“] Numenor 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They needed some form of notice to users in the form of a tag at post title level when all the comments had been deleted.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why? It was always the same answer. People posting personal takes without any credentials or cited sources.

[โ€“] Numenor 1 points 11 months ago

Because of this. You would see an interesting question, and enter the thread to read the responses and comments, only to find the the whole thread had been nuked. You would only find that out once you'd clicked into the thread, so I'm saying what was needed were tags stating something to the effect of "no comments here, don't bother"

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Agreed but I do think that's because the nature of the sub was more academic though, so having some kind of rigor makes sense. Not sure that's the model to follow for every community

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Almost every time I saw someone complaining about the mods, I would take a gander at their comment history, and surprise surprise it was almost always full of edgelord shit.

[โ€“] Cirom 2 points 11 months ago

Honestly, one of my favourite subs despite the very strict moderation (every post had to be manually approved) was r/tombstoning. Literally just images of newspaper articles where the headline and any related images/articles were very unfortunately placed. The mods basically ensured no reposts or posts that weren't quite correct got in - so the sub basically got a reputation of only having a post every other week or so, but when you saw a tombstoning post you'd know it was quality.