/kbin meta

639 readers

1 users here now

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

founded 1 year ago

128

Could we get official word on what Kbin's stance is towards federating with Meta? (kbin.social)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

206 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I would like to know if I can feel safe here, or if I should pack it up and start looking elsewhere sooner rather than later.

If the kbin staff have already made there intentions clear, please let me know.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

The code for mastodon, lemmy and kbin is open source and has been forked hundreds of times.

Admins can do whatever they like and people can build and deploy their own instance and enforce their own rules.

This is one of the key strengths of open source, people have forked projects took them in their own direction and had success.

Similarly ActivityPub is documented as a W3 standard, having read the standard the biggest weakness is the number of instances, not the size of the instances.

Also @mod I meant to hit reply and hit report and can't see how to revoke