this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
166 points (94.6% liked)

World News

39329 readers
1910 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] APassenger 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

halt Russian advances

This is my point. If Biden had an unlimited arsenal to send I think he would think twice about doing so.

Because nukes. We aren't disagreeing here, I don't think.

Regime change happens when Putin dies and it may not improve things. Trump is more likely to win than we are to see Putin toppled.

Edit: I was never talking NATO boots on ground. That seems like fantasy when we're struggling to provide them with ammo.

[–] DigitalTraveler42 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's all such a tricky situation, we all know Putin isn't going to deal in good faith, so you just have to kinda walk this tightrope, and that's what Biden and NATO are doing, and why Ukraine wasn't just brought into NATO already.

Trump is more likely to win than we are to see Putin toppled.

While you're definitely right, that just means we still have a problem until Puty dies or gets dethroned, and once Puty dies it's going to create quite the anxiety inducing power vacuum.

[–] APassenger 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Agree.

My general opinion, at this point:

  • Ukraine has shown and singalled that without help, the lines will be moving in the wrong direction.

  • If they get their borders back (win), Russia will have a strong argument that the war was with the West, not just Ukraine. And I don't know that Western politicians have the stomach for that kind of win, because the nuke thing, if nothing else.

  • The pols may be open to it, but even when there was less push back, I didn't see the will to win. It was the will to not lose, and then trust Ukraine had what it took.

  • At this point I think we know that Russia and Ukraine will have a massive generation-size gap in their male populations. And at the end of this, absent significant help, will be a slow war of attrition with Russia moving lines often enough to matter.

  • Anything short of restoration or either historical border is a loss. At least of land and lives, if not other.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 8 months ago

Rumor is Putin has cancer. If so, he may not have long to live but they said that two years ago.