Found this post super informative as it relates to Mastodon, and thought Lemmy might also benefit from this perspective. I'm not sure I share his optimism, but his points seem sound to dampen some of the alarm bells over Meta joining the Fediverse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I'd like to not embrace the assholes that helped centralize and control the narrative on their massive platforms of idiot users

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Then join an instance that's defederated with them, or create your own. It's literally that simple. Don't shit on open source devs for keeping their software open source.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

How am I shitting on open source devs? I'm just pointing out how crazy you'd have to be to think any corporate media participation in the fediverse is a good thing. Yes I can run my own instance but it won't do much good if the largest AP instances let Facebook federate with them. They're just trying to capitalize on other peoples work while spending a relatively small amount of money and effort on their own activitypub client. If it fails they won't care and will just abandon it but if it succeeds they'll be poaching users and data from the fediverse for years to come. Not to mention bringing those cringe IG and Facebook users around.

Also, Quick browse through your comment history and there seems to be quite a bit of shilling going on for Facebook. Hmmm...

[–] JeffCraig -2 points 1 year ago

Uh, we need participation from everyone in order for the fediverse to have legitimacy. We unfortunately need those cringe users if we want large scale adoption. Without it everything stays small scale, developers aren't attracted to the concept and people leave for functioning alternatives.

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (4 replies)