this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2023
261 points (99.6% liked)
13435 readers
3 users here now
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is peak corporate-speak. Is this real or satire?
This just might be AI but hard to differentiate
I see someone isn't thinking outside the box for scalable solutions incorporating our corporate values - given all the moving parts, we need to leverage best practices in order to get buy in from all parties.
Reddit practically invented the term "TQM". What do we maximize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! A company that can optimize faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to productize defiantly. We will synthesize the capability of power shifts to incentivize. Do you have a strategy to become co-branded? What does it really mean to disintermediate "interactively"? What does the term "wireless" really mean? What does it really mean to embrace "dynamically"? Without meticulously-planned seamless, sticky short-term mega-efficient development, interfaces are forced to become affiliate-based. Our functionality is second to none, but our virtual research and development and simple configuration is always considered an amazing achievement. Our scalable feature set is second to none, but our dynamic CAD and non-complex configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement. Quick: do you have a compelling scheme for coping with unplanned-for eyeballs? Think infinitely reconfigurable.
I thought 'Succession' was satire but these people really talk like Kendall Roy