main

1336 readers

1 users here now

Default community for midwest.social. Post questions about the instance or questions you want to ask other users here.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Meta's Threads.net (midwest.social)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Are we going to block Meta's Threads.net? I get it if people want to keep things open. However, Meta is a proven bad actor. They claim they didn't put in ActivityPub because it was too complicated to get it done at launch, and they can't get EU approval of their service because of the rampant and invasive data they gather. IMHO, they are going to attempt to muscle the fediverse out of the equation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Replying here instead of your other reply but yeah it definitely is like the paradox of tolerance but I will also add that for most people an open platform is probably not the #1 priority. I think a lot of people just want to be able to access content and/or update their friends and separating off threads wont help that

However who knows what can happen maybe threads will flop, or maybe they will make the fediverse mainstream and we will have the interconnectedness that we all want

At the end of the day though, some servers will block threads and some wont but with enough options everyone can join a server that fits their needs and that really is what the fediverse is about

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I feel like if you want to update your friends, an anonymous forum is not the greatest place to do that and I certainly don't want the fediverse to be about attaching your name to something.

Personally, I've never had a Facebook account and have no interest in their offerings. Nothing of worth seems to have ever come out of that place.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

yeah, i think it's totally fine that most people don't have being "open" as a priority. and to me, those people will continue to ride the waves of social media enshittification until they realize what's going on and look for something different (much like many of us here have done).

i think we have a chance to have a community break away from that. but giving the big players the ability to rally the masses and own most of the communities and content we end up interacting with is how we set ourselves up to be extinguished. maybe we will be able to avoid this by making sure we are interacting with many diverse instances, but only time can tell. the one thing we can be sure of is that meta and any others will be attempting to monopolize the platform.

At the end of the day though, some servers will block threads and some wont but with enough options everyone can join a server that fits their needs and that really is what the fediverse is about

yeah true, this part will be very interesting. i am just glad to be a part of a community with a common goal of being open and having discussions like this about what that means. i think that common ideal might actually have the potential to keep it together long term. and i think that's worth fighting for.