this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
204 points (94.0% liked)

Antifascism

360 readers
1 users here now

A community to post acts of antifascism and other left-wing activism. Please message a mod if you would like something posted and we can tag you in the post as well.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thesushicat 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Public universities are legally not allowed to ban controversial speakers, even if they are racist. It is a constitutional right, and banning free speech at a public institution amounts to government censorship. This article from the ACLU is relevant: https://www.aclu.org/documents/speech-campus

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But it's not even about him being controversial -- just pointless. What educational value does a boring, loser kid have to offer?

[–] stoly 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Public discourse is an educational experience. Universities aren't there to just teach you mathematics and basket weaving, it's there to challenge your viewpoint and make you question your assumptions. That comes from being exposed to differing, even extreme, viewpoints.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So we're just calling anything "education" these days.

[–] stoly 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You don't like Kyle Rittenhouse. I don't like Kyle Rittenhouse. He's a horrible human being and a terrible role model.

This falls under the "I will fight to the death for your right to speak" philosophy.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Again, not challenging his right to speak. Challenging the value of what he has to say.