this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)
Chess
1923 readers
10 users here now
Play chess on-line
FIDE Rankings
| # | Player | Country | Elo |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Magnus Carlsen | ๐ณ๐ด | 2839 |
| 2 | Fabiano Caruana | ๐บ๐ธ | 2786 |
| 3 | Hikaru Nakamura | ๐บ๐ธ | 2780 |
| 4 | Ding Liren ๐ | ๐จ๐ณ | 2780 |
| 5 | Alireza Firouzja | ๐ซ๐ท | 2777 |
| 6 | Ian Nepomniachtchi | ๐ท๐บ | 2771 |
| 7 | Anish Giri | ๐ณ๐ฑ | 2760 |
| 8 | Gukesh D | ๐ฎ๐ณ | 2758 |
| 9 | Viswanathan Anand | ๐ฎ๐ณ | 2754 |
| 10 | Wesley So | ๐บ๐ธ | 2753 |
Tournaments
September 4 - September 22
Check also
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I prefer lichess, but most of my friends are on chess.com
Same here, I find lichess to be a smoother experience. Although I prefer the rating system on chess.com as it seems to be more accurate to elo ratings. Overall I prefer lichess for no ads, no subscription pestering, and being entirely free.
The reason people think the Chess.com rating system is more accurate, is because it had used a more standardized default rating, and now the average on the site is closer to that of FIDE, USCF, etc. In reality, ratings are arbitrary numbers, and the only way ratings can be compared is with other ratings in the same system (site, federation). Chess.com actually uses the archaic Glicko-1, as opposed to the newer Glicko-2, which has important modifications in the realm of volatility, meaning the chance a player does something unexpected, and it leads to more accurate ratings, not less. Lichess, on the other hand, has updated to Glicko-2.