this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
26 points (65.9% liked)

Psychology

348 readers
3 users here now

Come talk about psychology and related disciplines.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
26
The Dunning-Kruger effect is not real (economicsfromthetopdown.com)
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/psychology
 

Have you heard of the ‘Dunning-Kruger effect’? It’s the (apparent) tendency for unskilled people to overestimate their competence. Discovered in 1999 by psychologists Justin Kruger and David Dunning, the effect has since become famous.

Except there’s a problem.

The Dunning-Kruger effect also emerges from data in which it shouldn’t. For instance, if you carefully craft random data so that it does not contain a Dunning-Kruger effect, you will still find the effect. The reason turns out to be embarrassingly simple: the Dunning-Kruger effect has nothing to do with human psychology.1 It is a statistical artifact — a stunning example of autocorrelation.

EDIT: see response from dustyData and the article they linked to https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologist/dunning-kruger-effect-and-its-discontents

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Yup! The overall tone of the text comes of as arrogant and smug...

I was writing a very long wall of text to explain how the authors comprehension of statistics is limited, but it doesn't matter so much.

I read the beginning of their response and I can't tell if the rest was supposed to be a joke.