Programmer Humor

32710 readers

292 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1092

Solutions? Where we're going, we don't need solutions. (lemmy.world)

submitted 9 months ago by renzev to c/[email protected]

162 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Please dont take this seriously guys its just a dumb meme I haven't written a single line of code in half of these languages

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 25 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Problem → return Solution;

C++:

Problem →

const [auto]&& (Problem&& problem) noexcept(noexcept( Solution<Problem>{}(std::forward<Problem>(problem)) )) { return Solution<Problem>{}(std::forward<Problem>(problem)); } -> decltype( Solution<Problem>{}(std::forward<Problem>(problem)) )

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

return *(solution_t*)&problem;

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Maximum optimization!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But this doesn't return the Solution. You don't invoke the lambda.

(Or does C++ have implied returns now? Last I heard there was implied move)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Actually I do; it's the {} that initializes the lambda, and the parenthesis after invokes.

That said, it would have been fun.