Political Humor

813 readers

1 users here now

Welcome to Political Humor!

Rules:

Be excellent to each other.
No harassment.
No sexism, racism or bigotry.
All arguments should be made in good faith.
No misinformation. Be prepared to back up your factual claims with evidence.
All posts should relate to politics and be of a humorous nature.
No bots, spam or self-promotion.
If you want to run a bot, ask first.
Site wide rules apply.
Have fun.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

BuckRowdy

Diplomjodler3

397

Gotta show up (lemmy.world)

submitted 8 months ago by JimmyMemes to c/politicalhumor

103 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The proper reply to being called out for relaying an untruth is "my bad, what I meant is __", and life goes on. That's how discourse should go.

It's not asking for much.

There's no need to pander to ambiguity when a miscommunication is easily corrected.

RE: actual subject on Biden, no horse in this race. Just chimed in because I hate seeing potential misinformation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I feel like you're demanding the take part of the give-and-take flow of constructive argumentation upfront. This serves mostly to misdirect from the issue rather event attempt to tackle it, and that's why it's not compelling to me

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's fair.

IMO online comments are an extremely poor medium for ambiguous comments because:

There's very little context provided.
"Conversations" typically are composed of, at most, 3-4 messages from each party.
It takes a while for each party to type up their response.

Due to these reasons, ambiguities should at least attempt to be cleared up with up front.

Sure you don't have to do that, but then you just get misunderstood, wasting everyone's time.

What you're suggesting applies far more easily in an IRL conversation. I can look for body language, like a smile indicating joking. Conversations take seconds instead of minutes, and there's far more back and forth

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Agree again. In this instance the commenter was pretty clearly pro-abortion though. I think in terms of speculating on their potential position with limited info, that's also a vector where you could have at least a reasonable degree of certainty about which quadrant of the political compass they fall in.