Asklemmy

44151 readers

1717 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

251

Is "female" offensive? (self.asklemmy)

submitted 9 months ago by Trincapinones to c/[email protected]

281 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I am not a native English speaker and I have sometimes referred to people as male and female (as that is what I have been taught) but I have received some backlash in some cases, especially for the word "female", is there some negative thought in the word which I am unaware of?

I don't know if this is the best place to ask, if it's not appropriate I have no problem to delete it ^^

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bruhduh 19 points 9 months ago (2 children)

male/female usually used for animals, for humans usage of man/woman would be the right way

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I disagree. Male/female is used plenty with humans, but it tends to be used in a more clinical or 'objective' manner, such as in legal documents, autopsy reports, police suspect descriptions, things of that sort.

I think the use of, e.g., "Look at those four males over there", it has a bit of a connotation of separation of the personhood of the people involved. A man is a living, thinking being; he is worthy of dignity, and he has a soul. A 'male' can almost be called an 'it': it has a characterization of cold, scientific classification.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

A ‘male’ can almost be called an ‘it’: it has a characterization of cold, scientific classification.

But that's the issue: its dehumanizing and that's done intentionally. The use case you mention seems to just be an extension of its usage for livestock rather than an exception. But its an exception to it being used in a misogynistic way while still being a noun.

[–] arin 3 points 9 months ago

Don't bring science to feminism!

[–] Harbinger01173430 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Humans are animals though. Why do they get offended when they get reminded of that fact? Smh, this is why us members of the galactic community don't like your species too much. /S

[–] arin 4 points 9 months ago

Kinda like how ignorant people only thing humans have consciousness while more and more studies show capability in many animals

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Maybe that's how you animals in your "galactic community" operate, but be careful... a lot of people in these parts eat animals for breakfast. For your own self preservation you might want to come up with some reasons why you're more than just an animal before we get to barbecue season.

[–] Harbinger01173430 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Alright. Time to change living conditions to 'livestock'. I think some of you do it in your space simulator games. /S