this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
19 points (95.2% liked)

ethfinance

33 readers
1 users here now

A community for investors, traders, users, developers, and others to discuss Ethereum and its cryptocurrency ETH. Join us on Discord, too! https://discord.gg/evmavericks

founded 1 year ago
 

Welcome to the Weekly General Discussion on Ethfinance

Massive List of Ethereum Links! - under construction
[Magazine Rules] - see sidebar
Discord - EV Mavericks
Twitter
Be awesome to one another and be sure to contribute the most high quality posts over on our sister magazines. Or guide them here for help and community, too!

Daily Doots Rich List - https://dailydoots.com/

community calendar: via Ethstaker https://ethstaker.cc/event-calendar/

"Find and post crypto jobs." https://cryptojobs.gg/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m personally sitting this one out. I’ve watched Sreeram’s lectures and I share some excitement about the innovative concept of Eigenlayer. I can see that the additional degree of abstraction that it brings creates novel use cases that cleverly leverage Ethereum’s consensus protocol.

But I’ve also chosen to forego some yield by solo-staking instead of playing the LST game because I want what’s best not just for myself, but for the Ethereum network of which I consider myself a modest but principled steward.

For now, I’m applying the same cautious logic to Eigenlayer. I may be foregoing some hypothetical future airdrops and extra yield, but I won’t rush into something so fresh that its impact is not yet fully understood. Like you, the risk of slashing my own node is not even my main concern; the risk of subverting the network is.

The most neutral advice I can give is to read Vitalik’s post on the topic if you haven’t done so already (https://vitalik.ca/general/2023/05/21/dont_overload.html) and decide how much risk the restaking use case you’re considering brings to Ethereum.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have the exact same viewpoint. Hopefully the coredevs design the protocol such that this behaviour is discouraged if it really does bring a net negative effect to the network. Can't expect all participants to be foregoing yields in the long run.