It is Heritage, warmongering neocons. The article mixes some truths with chauvinism and denialism.
If the source is so bad, why did you post it?
They are still right in their assessment of the situation, just as typical they get the cause and solution wrong. It is good to read a perspective you don't necessarily agree with.
It is Heritage, warmongering neocons. The article mixes some truths with chauvinism and denialism.
If the source is so bad, why did you post it?
They are still right in their assessment of the situation, just as typical they get the cause and solution wrong. It is good to read a perspective you don't necessarily agree with.