It feels like they’re two different roles. It might be better to have user-orientated servers that prioritise federation of content and only have a couple of meta-style communities, and other servers which prioritise being the go-to place for discussion on a particular topic and less a place that manages a large number of user accounts.

It just seems like two really distinct roles all servers are trying to do at the same time, and it’s leading to larger sites with a lot of users duplicating all the same subs, rather than there being any particular spot for certain types of discussion.

It also means the server hosting a particular type of discussion might defed certain instances to prevent trolling when it’s a sensitive topic, but it wouldn’t affect a large userbase who have that as their home server, it would only be moderating the discussion for the content areas they specialise in.

Thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why tho? If we can get standardized protocols and stuff, why not a standardized login system where 1 account works on every site?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Reposting from below:

Digital identity at scale is still in the research stages and requires a fair amount of capital. This is why Google and social logins are dominant.

Unless someone has a rabbit in thier pocket we are waiting for a decentralized form of auth. There are some but people don’t really like them. Even here.

The w3c standard you want to look into is DiD

Source: day job