this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
338 points (96.2% liked)

linuxmemes

21225 readers
97 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith
    zephyr
    rtxn
    338
    Parsing HTML with regex (lemmy.sdf.org)
    submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/linuxmemes
    40 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     

    cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/12950329

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

    Actually, you can't even parse html (5) with specialized tools or by converting it and then using xml linters (they quit out due to too many errors). Only tools capable of reliably parsing html (mostly) are the big 3 browser engines. Experience from converting saved webpages to asciidoctor, it involves cleaning up manually, despite tidy and pandoc.

    [–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

    This isn't true. HTML5 made a very strict set of rules and there are a large handful of compliant parsers. But yes, you absolutely can't use an XML parser. You can't even use an XML emitter, as you can emit valid XML that means something completely different in HTML.

    ...what a fucking disaster. I still wish XHTML won.

    [–] piecat 1 points 8 months ago

    Real question, why? I feel like there's a story there