Asklemmy

43995 readers

1200 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

215

What is something that gets a lot of hate for absolutely no reason? (midwest.social)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

474 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] federatingIsTooHard 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

say what you mean.

[–] PP_BOY_ 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Capitalism is also a stateless economic philosophy, and like communism, is completely incompatible with modern politics (for better or worse, your choice). The argument that the Soviet Union, China, etc. weren't real Communism because they didn't meet some make-believe qualifications is pointlessly redundant when those states were very proud to call themselves Communists. In other words, their existence retroactively changed the working definition of what a Communist state is by virtue of being the only realized state to call themselves such.

[–] federatingIsTooHard 1 points 9 months ago

The argument that the Soviet Union, China, etc. weren’t real Communism because they didn’t meet some make-believe qualifications is pointlessly redundant when those states were very proud to call themselves Communists.

if i call myself the queen of england, it doesn't make it so. communism has a definition and it is impossible for a state to be communist since communism is stateless.

[–] federatingIsTooHard 1 points 9 months ago

Capitalism is also a stateless economic philosophy,

no, it's not. the term is coined by marx in reference to a system of production in which the ownership of the means of production is held by a capitalist class by means of private property claims. private property claims necessarily depend on a state to do things like write deeds and enforce them. whoever told you otherwise is lying.