this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
42 points (97.7% liked)

Australia

3582 readers
31 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
42
National anti-corruption commissioner promises to be 'fearless but fair', revealing 44 complaints already received (www.abc.net.au)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Key points (from ABC article): -Forty-four complaints have been made to the National Anti-Corruption Commission since it opened its doors on Saturday -Commissioner Paul Brereton says he may hold public hearings, but will also call out people who seek to weaponise the NACC -The NACC will aim to complete 90 per cent of its inquiries within a year

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it could do either of those, it would be in charge of government defacto as any offending politicians can just be investigated and sacced with no limits.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IF found guilty of corruption. So it can find them guilty and the government of the day can just ignore it to maintain a majority.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am not saying it is guaranteed that it would descend into corruption, but surely you can see how a body with the singular power to investigate and judge the only people who can constrain it would be ripe for abuse?

Since they report to a standing committee made up of MPs, giving them the unilateral power to investigate and judge those same MPs gives them a good deal of power.

Alternatively, if those MPs are somehow "immune" to prevent this, then it gives THOSE MPs an outsized bit of power in government.

The biggest danger is if the corruption is used subtly since we wouldn't even notice; it would even look like they are "rooting out corruption"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

The alternative is what we have now, the premier of NSW found guilty of corruption with zero accountability or consequences. Nice paid role at Optus as head of government business acquisition.