Lemmy.ca's Main Community

2758 readers

1 users here now

Welcome to lemmy.ca's c/main!

Since everyone on lemmy.ca gets subscribed here, this is the place to chat about the goings on at lemmy.ca, support-type items, suggestions, etc.

Announcements can be found at https://lemmy.ca/c/meta

For support related to this instance, use https://lemmy.ca/c/lemmy_ca_support

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

[New Rule discussion] No Editorializing Article Titles. The original title of the article must be used. (lemmy.ca)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Edit: This rule seems to be much more nuanced and requires more thought than we had put in, please continue to discuss below.

It is NOT in effect at this time but highly recommend for regional subreddits at least.

~~The above rule has been added to the instance and will be enforced instance wide.~~ This rule is very common within most existing communities where news articles are shared and avoids sensationalizing the story or attempts at steering discussion by the user posting the article.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

But is it a necessity?

https://lemmy.ca/post/1088973

Posts like this one is why regional communities on the dead site had rules like this. So yeah it can be argued that it's necessary.

Generally my flow with writing a typical article-based Lemmy post is: Article title or one-liner paraphrase of article in the header, more details/summary in the body staying mostly neutral with only a bit of my opinion, and my full opinion on it within a separate comment.

That fits within the intention of the rule in my opinion.