Technology

34806 readers

213 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

An AI model designed a functional RISC-V CPU in less than 5 hours. - The Verge (www.theverge.com)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by AlmightySnoo to c/[email protected]

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Left: The outputs of booting up the Linux operating system. Right: The performance of generated CPU (i.e., CPU-AI) is compared against commercial CPUs on the Dhrystone benchmark, and CPU-AI performs comparably to the human-designed Intel 80486SX CPU.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SheeEttin 8 points 1 year ago

In addition, the generated Boolean function is almost zero tolerance to inaccuracy, otherwise, CPUs will be malfunctioned and cause a huge amount of loss. A recent case in 2017 is that the Intel Atom C2000 bug affected many famous vendors, among which Cisco prepared 125M dollars to replace related products32. [...] In this article, we report a RISC-V CPU automatically designed by a new AI approach, which generates large-scale Boolean function with almost 100% validation accuracy (e.g., > 99.99999999999% as Intel)

Oh good, that was going to be my question. A new CPU is all well and good, but if you don't validate it to prove it doesn't have some weird bug, then it's worthless.