this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
853 points (95.3% liked)

memes

10649 readers
4117 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
853
Look at hiiim (lemmy.world)
submitted 10 months ago by nifty to c/memes
 

Reposting bc I dun goofed before

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Huh? What are you talking about? What would a second be a multiple of?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Nanoseconds, milliseconds, picoseco….

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

You could change the length of a second so a day is 100 kilo seconds for instance.

Much like other imperial measurements the length of a second is arbitrary.

[–] rImITywR 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The second is actually the most fundamental unit of the metric system. For example, a metre is defined by how far light travels on some fraction of a second.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesium_standard

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

You can just change that, though, so long as the change is consistent. All units of measurement are human constructs, and definitely aren't immutable.

[–] Pohl 10 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The length of a day is variable. You would have to update the second (and every unit derived fro It) after every big earthquake, and a thousand other events.

The solar system does not give a shit about your preference for base 10 numbers there will always be (roughly) 365.25 rotations per revolution and you don’t get a choice about that.

[–] wjrii 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. You don't get very far at all before perfectly natural divisions of time can't divide evenly by 10. You can't "fix" it, like you can with mass or length, unless you demand people give up on centering time around astronomical events. The second is an SI unit. Science can be done in seconds. Anything else just shifts the awkwardness of orbital mechanics elsewhere, while pissing everyone off.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Can you explain this argument to me.

The second is currently a fixed length, there's a fixed amount in the day and we don't adjust it now.

So how would it be any different if we changed the amounts?

[–] wjrii 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My main point is that you've done nothing but kick the can down the road a little bit, so people decided it wasn't worth the trouble. It's annoying that there 60 seconds in a minute, 1800 in an hour, ~86k in a day, fair enough. Let's say you make a new metric second that has 100k in a day. You make certain things easier, but how are you keeping time on anything like a larger scale?

You can probably come up with something fairly usable with ten-day weeks, but what about years? This is is where it breaks down. A year is based on astronomical events, but different ones than a day, both are deeply ingrained into the routines of life. It is 365 and a a quarter (-ish) days in a year. We're stuck with that, unless you just want a number that has no useful context for humans after a few years. Throw in that you also have leap seconds to add every so often, and in the end it's still going to be a mess of decimal units that go unused, and customary units that will not be given up, but with all the drama of making a change.

There is no single bandaid to pull off, so it's not the obvious improvement that other weights and measures are, because time is more fundamentally rooted in our experience as animals than what we label a given amount of stuff.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Decimal time works perfectly. For years, as you say, you are stuck by how long a year is. All you can do here is better divide the months. 13 x 28 days is my preference.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Due to tidal forces, the length of a day is constantly trending longer. Also, the moon is slowly drifting away from the earth for the same reason and lunar months are also getting longer.

So, no, the day hasn't been and will not always be the same length.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

It isn't in our current system.

[–] SlopppyEngineer 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"The second [...] is defined by taking the fixed numerical value of the caesium frequency, ΔνCs, the unperturbed ground-state hyperfine transition frequency of the caesium 133 atom, to be 9192631770 when expressed in the unit Hz, which is equal to s−1.[1]"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Those definitions are picked to be as immutable, unambiguous and easily replicated in a lab as possible, but have nothing to do why a second is defined like that.

But did you know that if you tie exactly 1m of string to some heavy object, it will swing once per second?