Technology

55766 readers

3039 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

435

Shell Is Immediately Closing All Of Its California Hydrogen Stations | The oil giant is one of the big players in hydrogen globally, but even it can't make its operations work here. (insideevs.com)

submitted 4 months ago by L4s to c/technology

307 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Shell Is Immediately Closing All Of Its California Hydrogen Stations | The oil giant is one of the big players in hydrogen globally, but even it can't make its operations work here.::The oil giant is one of the big players in hydrogen globally, but even it can't make its operations work here. All seven of its California stations will close immediately.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (9 children)

Instead you rely on Shell to provide hydrogen to you when there's no pre-existing infrastructure to deliver it and... Oh, looks like they decided to put an end to it, have fun with your brick on wheels 🤷

[+] daqqad -10 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Shell is one of many companies providing hydrogen fuel stations. Infra may not be where it should be, but I blame that on all the people who jumped on battery powered cars at a time battery tech is years of not decades away from being good in vehicles.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Green hydrogen--where it's produced entirely using renewable resources--currently costs at least twice as much as producing it from hydrocarbons. Depending on the details, it can be seven times as much. Pink hydrogen--water electrolysis powered by nuclear--is barely much better.

The vast majority of production comes from hydrocarbons. Most of it currently goes to the agricultural industry for making nitrate fertilizer.

This is entirely the petrochemical industry trying to open up a new market before it loses its current biggest one.

[–] daqqad 1 points 4 months ago

I get it, but cost is irrelevant if it is produced using green power that would otherwise be wasted anyway from overproduction.

load more comments (5 replies)

load more comments (6 replies)