this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
542 points (90.4% liked)

Comic Strips

12965 readers
1982 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In my book, if you have to explain it, it's not art, but eveyone can obviously have their opinion. And yeah I know about the toilet :-p

[–] jopepa 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

However you want to enjoy art is cool, but narrowing the definition seems like an arbitrary reason to limit what you can be open to enjoy. Context≠explaining it, though.

Didn’t mean to art-splain at you by the way, no offense intended.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah no offence taken!

And well if someone says aah say wine is art or running is art, I'd still enjoy it ;-)

What's art? Vast debate.

[–] jopepa 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Good question with a pretty ambiguous answer for anyone that’d try to answer.

For me it’s a combination of skill, intention, and impact. Like a shaky handed sharpie tag on a bus stop isn’t much of anything, but when it says, “kill your local heroin dealer” that’s impactful. The shaky lines start to show the styling they had intended but can’t capture anymore. I’d call that art even though it was painted over a week later.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Intetesting.

For me skill has nothing to do with it (within reason I guess), it may probably just produce better or worse art.

Impact, that's the same thing, I shouldn't have to care about how others perceive my art, should I?

So I guess for me the intentent is the thing, but it must be that, real intent. If my intent is to express my horrors over heroin dealers, I cant just paint a box in blue and then "explain" myself out of it.

Now if an ex heroin addict paints blue boxes because he lived in blue boxes for years, then that's probably a real expression though and thus art. And I bet he wouldn't feel the need to explain even if he can.

I'm not sure I'm very clear here, but intent it is I think, so hard to prove.