this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
5 points (100.0% liked)

Almost anything regarding Singapore

470 readers
1 users here now

Singapore related posts (any deletion by moderators WILL come with explanation) Moderation will be stepped up as the community grows. Ask Singapore related questions at !asksingapore

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The government does not condone any exploitative employment contracts, said the Manpower Minister.

SINGAPORE: Guidelines on the use of a job stipulation that restricts an employee from working for a competitor are being finalised and are expected to be made known in the second half of 2024, the Manpower Minister Tan See Leng announced on Tuesday (Feb 6).

Also known as restraint of trade clauses, the non-compete rule has caused unease recently with high-profile examples from two big-name tech firms.

Former Lazada employees who spoke to CNA after the retrenchment exercise in early January questioned their 12-month non-compete clause that covered an extensive list of tech, retail and logistics companies.

Last week, the courts dismissed Shopee's requests for injunctions against a former employee who resigned and moved to ByteDance. When he first joined Shopee, he had signed a Restrictive Covenants Agreement with a non-solicitation and non-competition clause, as well as an Employee Confidentiality Agreement.

“We understand that overly restrictive restraint of trade clauses can disadvantage retrenched employees and create difficulties in finding employment,” said Dr Tan, responding to several parliamentary questions about Lazada’s recent retrenchment exercise

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] trewq 2 points 9 months ago

If company want non compete restrictions, they should pay full salary for the duration.

But then in business friendly world, what are the chances of that?