this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
496 points (96.6% liked)

Funny

7256 readers
2347 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue 43 points 11 months ago (15 children)

I would not hire a photographer without the agreement specifying that I get to keep the raw files (either in addition to or instead of whatever retouching the photographer wanted to do).

[–] netwren 28 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (14 children)

I have met a few photographers who absolutely will not agree to that and it infuriates me. Must be some new trend of pro photographer influencer bull to hold your raws hostage.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The raws affect the photographer’s reputation, if someone else presents them as “This is some of that photographer’s work”

[–] netwren 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So watermark the raw as unedited or something so you can verify it wasn't your finished product. Don't lock me out of being unable to see the actual moment of me and my family.

[–] shneancy 2 points 11 months ago

it's not the "actual moment" though. Doesn't matter how unedited it looks like, how "actual" it feels it's still an image captured by a camera in a flawed way

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)