KDE

5503 readers

282 users here now

KDE is an international technology team creating user-friendly free and open source software for desktop and portable computing. KDE’s software runs on GNU/Linux, BSD and other operating systems, including Windows.

Plasma 6 Bugs

If you encounter a bug, proceed to https://bugs.kde.org, check whether it has been reported.

If it hasn't, report it yourself.

PLEASE THINK CAREFULLY BEFORE POSTING HERE.

Developers do not look for reports on social media, so they will not see it and all it does is clutter up the feed.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Gnome Boxes alternative for KDE. (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hey people,

Recently I switched to KDE Plasma on all of my devices and I like it a lot, however one thing I would still like to see is a virtual machine KDE application. I would be more than happy to get my hands dirty, however I don't quite know what I am expecting so I have a few questions:

As far as I am aware, Boxes is just an interface, written with GTK, for QEMU. Is doing the same with Kirigami feasible for a solo developer.
Moreover I am quite profound in C++ and programming in general, but I never worked on bigger projects
I am quite amazed by Parallels in MacOs, would it be possible to copy some features for KDE, i.e a vm occupying a whole virtual desktop, or single windows "popping" out of the vm.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] cspiegel 2 points 2 years ago

There is a Qt interface for libvirt, called qt-virt-manager. This is a rough analog of virt-manager. Unfortunately, it hasn't seen a release since August 2021, nor a git commit since the same time. The good news is that it's written in C++: if you're so inclined, you ought to be able to get up to speed at least a bit faster than you would with a project in another language.

As much as I'd like a KDE-native VM GUI, I still just use virt-manager since it's maintained, and gets the job done. Generally I'm just using ssh to access VMs anyway, so it hardly matters. But if qt-virt-manager made a comeback, I'd definitely give it strong consideration.