this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
69 points (79.0% liked)

World News

32531 readers
698 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bisby 11 points 11 months ago (3 children)

But that wasnt the threat. They were going to stop him from blowing up the plane by.... blowing up the plane.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

There is a difference between the plane being blown up over London, or shot down over farm fields

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

By blowing up the plane before it can blow up and whatever else it hits.

[–] BradleyUffner 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In theory, the threat could have just been a bluff to gain control of the plane.

[–] bisby 1 points 11 months ago

bluffing a threat to the plane by snapchatting your friend would be a weird move. No one on the plane even knew a "threat" was made.

It seems like "we have no details at all about the threat (because it wasn't actually credible), so let's just be prepared for every situation" is the logic.