this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
3297 points (94.9% liked)

Malicious Compliance

19597 readers
1 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

[email protected] [email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The court is simply throwing out precedent to allow discrimination just like they threw out precedent to allow state abortion bans. It's not about legal hair splitting or any kind of logic, just pushing their right wing extremist agenda.

[–] JudgeHolden 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Scarcely. Read the majority opinion. It specifically carves out an exception for "creative works" (or whatever the exact term is, I honestly don't remember) which in effect says that you cannot be forced by law to create something that espouses a position or creed with which you disagree.

As of right now I don't have a strong opinion on the ruling either way, but I think it's worth getting what it says right before we condemn it.

I lean towards thinking that it makes distinctions with which I agree, but I'm going to withhold judgement until I learn more about the arguments and we have a better sense of how it's going to play out in practice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The Supreme Court is a fucking joke, none of their opinions deserve serious consideration. They're nothing but right wing ideologues pursuing their racist, sexist, homophobic, and anti-worker agenda.