this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
270 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

35003 readers
315 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Probably not but one can hope… to the Fediverse lemmings!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dub 24 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It's clear that something is going on. At least for Reddit and Twitter, they need to make money. They've made that pretty obvious but it is curious why now. Facebook and others didn't seem to have this issue. YouTube sounds like google just Google

I'm not sure how Lemmy will last if it grows massively. But I'm here for a good time not a long

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The interest rates went up, and it broke Silicon Valley's infinite money cheat, so they are all under pressure to become profitable.

[–] dub 1 points 1 year ago

I was thinking similar. Might be the dot com crash 2.0. No more free money at insanely low interest rates

[–] foxblood 8 points 1 year ago

Central banks, especially in Europe and North America, are raising the rates. Lending money isn’t cheap anymore and running a service on debt only becomes a headache.

[–] Laxaria 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wikipedia has done well for itself using donation runs and grassroots support, so if there are ways for instances to do similar the decentralized nature of this will work out ok.

Elsewhere the issue is many of these large services have grown to the size of effectively being a public good, but good luck maintaining a public good in a profit generating way as a private company seeking the next quarter's growth.

[–] dub 5 points 1 year ago

That's a good point. Wikipedia isn't a for-profit company so they don't have to show insane profit every quarter in order to calm shareholders. I donate to Wikipedia all the time cause I appreciate what they provide.

[–] AlmightySnoo 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Facebook and others didn’t seem to have this issue

maybe because Facebook already required users to login before seeing most of the content?

[–] dub 2 points 1 year ago

Could be. but i would argue that would be worse than a free-to-view website that just ran ads as you didnt need sign up or anything to view them.

[–] Nioxic 2 points 1 year ago

well, im sure google changed their chrome browser to let ads through, for income..

youtube and google are the most visisted websites in the world and.. chrome is(was?) the most used browser.

it was clearly a move to see how much more ad-revenue they could gain.

and i guess this is the next move. simply say "you cannot watch youtube unless... "