Asklemmy

43755 readers

2266 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

128

Do EV's actually do anything beneficial for the planet? (lemmy.today)

submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

195 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've seen a lot of posts here on Lemmy, specifically in the "fuck cars" communities as to how Electric Vehicles do pretty much nothing for the Climate, but I continue to see Climate activists everywhere try pushing so, so hard for Electric Vehicles.

Are they actually beneficial to the planet other than limiting exhaust, or is that it? or maybe exhaust is a way bigger problem?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I’m telling you that’s impossible from an average person standpoint.

I don't care about this mythical "average person".

You don’t have a government that actively tries to stop building rail.

I wish man, I wish.

Just because you have it extremely bad in the U.S. doesn't mean the rest of the world is doing great, even if it's quite a lot better. "Quite a lot better" than "extremely bad" still turns out to be "pretty bad".

Midwest states are literally trying to stop federal money from coming in to build rail. We protest, we argue, but people are literally voting against that.

(More U.S. politics BS)

The reasons for that are a different discussion on an entirely different thing that is a general problem that affects all kinds of sectors and has nothing to do with transport specifically.

I only care about the factually-based way forward, not what a bunch of brainwashed monkeys licking aristocrat arses have to say about it.

Eliminating said monkeys is an entirely separate discussion to me.

I’m going to push for EVs in those areas for those who actually want to change their habits.

That's the part I most disagree with. The people who haven't been brain washed quite as much yet should be desiring the proper solution, not the bad "solution" that will still get us killed.

Presenting BEVs as our lord and saviour will do the opposite of that.

I’m not going to actively encourage they keep buying massive trucks that spew pollution, since that’s apparently the only alternative you can give us.

Not once in my argument have I mentioned or implied trucks as a valid alternative to BEVs.

Driving ice cars is knowingly killing the planet, and EVs is a solution for those people who live in places where their government literally tries to kill public transit.

That's the thing, it's not a solution; it's a minor mitigation. It's still killing our living space but not quite as badly. That is obviously preferable but nowhere near a solution.

What I want is BEVs to be seen for what they are, not for what they aren't. As a means to an end, BEVs are okay. They're not an end however and that's what they're widely seen as. That's what I find incredibly dangerous.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

So we agree?! That public transit is obviously better, we should push governments to build it, that EVs are not a solution but a temporary mitigation, and that ICE vehicles are bad for our planet.

Why do you continue arguing with me if you agree with me?! I told you I agree with all of your points, you just keep coming after me. I literally do not know what you want from me

Why are you putting so much effort into arguing with me who agrees with, I'll say, 95ish% of what you said, instead of going out and pushing this hard on people who are literally trying to kill public transit? Go argue with them.