this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
42 readers
1 users here now
Computers, phones, AI, whatever
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I like BitWarden, but I'm not 100% sold on cloud-based solutions. The encryption is probably fine, but is the whole payload? Also, I'm torn between "big" and "small" password managers.
A small one is less likely to be targeted. A big one will probably have more security infrastructure/employees.
One bummer with BitWarden is that the UI just isn't very good. For example, you can't select more than one item in the desktop electron app.
I agree that the bitwarden UI isn't very good on the desktop app and in the browser extension. I don't even use the desktop app at all anymore. One positive for protonpass is that the ui is looking pretty streamlined and it feels fast. I think for just the endless regular internet accounts either is fine.
It's a fair point about small vs. big. I mean security by obscurity doesn't really seem like a strong point for small, but who knows. I think higher value targets will always end up using the bigger ones anyway.
Important stuff (banking/development secrets) maybe use something like gpg based and offline like https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Pass or the Qt frontend https://qtpass.org/.
If only banks had meaningful security themselves.
Ultimately I'm less worried about banks, because all of that stuff can be reversed. Banking is almost designed with the idea that you'll be compromised.
I'm more worried about losing all my important files.