this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
1321 points (96.0% liked)

Memes

44060 readers
1743 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aganim 27 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

5 bucks? If only.. It's 12 euros per month here, which is simply too expensive for the kind of content I watch on YT. Especially considering the amount of baked in product placement (VPN, diet plans, that kind of crap) that I come across, I'm not paying that kind of money just to still get hammered with commercials. Sorry, but YouTube Premium is a bad deal here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Either watch ads or pay for Premium. Or don't watch Youtube. Those are the three choices most people will have. And it's Youtube's right as a private platform to give them those choices.

It's worth it for me because I watch a lot of Youtube. In return, I don't watch traditional TV, so I don't pay for cable or similar things.

[–] Sheeple 2 points 5 months ago

My choice: Firefox with uBlock Origin because I get to decide what reaches my screen

[–] Aganim 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Either watch ads or pay for Premium

Unfortunately though it is 'pay for Premium and still watch ads'. So many videos have the ads baked in by the content creators. Yes, you can manually seek forward, but that's annoying and defeating the purpose of Premium. Especially for the price they ask in my country.

Either watch ads or pay for Premium. Or don't watch Youtube. Those are the three choices most people will have. And it's Youtube's right as a private platform to give them those choices.

I fully agree, never suggested otherwise. But fortunately free speech allows us to have an opinion about a product.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I get what you're saying, and yes, sponsored segments can be pretty annoying, even if it's up to the creator how annoying they are. Either way, I just run SponsorBlock, so I can skip those segments with one click.

[–] micka190 -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Those are the three choices most people will have.

LMAO

You forgot the simplest of them: Firefox, uBlock Origins, SponsorBlock. Works on desktop and Android.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Homie missed the point. using ublock and sponsorblock is equal to petty theft. Disliking a company doesn't make it morally right to steal from them.

[–] Sheeple 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Imagine acting like removing unwanted content from MY screen is theft. My device my rules honey

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh baby, you don't understand what you just said, do you?

Nobody forces you to watch ads. Close YouTube, don't look back, email content creators to have em send ad free video links directly to you.

Watching ads is your obligation as consumer, if you decide not to pay for their removal.

[–] Sheeple 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It's not my obligation and I'm never going to stop because controlling what appears on my screen, is my legal right ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ

If people decide to pay for something they have no legal obligation to because they got brainwashed, that only makes them suckers

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You are mixing two things. Nobody can just blast ads on your phone without your consent. But you did give consent by accessing YouTube.

[–] Sheeple 0 points 5 months ago

I did not according to EU law :D

[–] micka190 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You're not going to guilt trip me out of adblocking Google of all fucking companies lmao

[–] [email protected] -4 points 5 months ago

No, I'm not here to defend Alphabet. I'm just saying it's equal to stealing groceries at Wallmart. They request payment, you deny. Just because it's so much easier to do on YouTube doesn't mean it's any more justifiable.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You mean the browsers that Google is throttling Youtube on, if they're blocking ads? I use Firefox with SponsorBlock myself, but I'd say that most people are using either Chrome or Edge and would not switch to Firefox, despite of how much better it would be. Most people just like what they're used to.

[–] micka190 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Man, you're all over this thread sticking up to Google. You should apply there. They just laid off 100 YouTube employees. At least you'd be paid to shill.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Fuck off lol. I'm not sticking up for Google/Alphabet, they're an untrustworthy company and as someone working in tech, I hate the trend of layoffs currently going on, all to make shareholders happy.

I'm sticking up for people actually paying for the services they use. Streaming videos costs a shitton of money (servers, bandwith, platform maintenance, etc.) and Youtube has lost money for literal YEARS, which they are trying to fix. If Youtube went under for being too unprofitable, most creators on the platform would be out of a job. As long as there's no proper competing platform, Youtube is the best we have.

[–] Sheeple 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Then maybe YouTube deserves to die

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Sheeple 0 points 5 months ago