Conservative

374 readers

56 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

-31

Supreme Court stays out of fight over transgender student bathroom access (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The SCOTUS needs to take this or a case like it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[+] [email protected] -6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Bostock v. Clayton Count

I am aware but that is SCOTUS creating law which is the same issue with Roe VS Wade.

I think you are slowly catching on to the issue. The courts have not been consistent and as such they need to clarify. If you remember the case, people were surprised Gorsuch voted the way he did but it is consistent with his beliefs.

I think the court was incorrect in its ruling using the Civil Rights Act. The Civil Rights Act does not cover this topic. As such congress needed to amend it to cover sexuality or gender identity.

Otherwise, we have courts making laws which I am against. Alito spoke out that since it was defined, it wasn't protected.

I am not against the protections, but I am against the courts writing law. If you haven't read the case, I would suggest doing so as you will see the issue. They defined sex as orientation or identity which is not how the word was ever used.

This is exactly why Roe was overturned.

The correct way to fix this is congress has to pass a law.