this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
12 points (92.9% liked)
MTG
1923 readers
2 users here now
Magic: the Gathering discussion
General discussion, questions, and media related to Magic: the Gathering that doesn't fit within a more specific community. Our equivalent of /r/magicTCG!
Type [[Card name]]
in your posts and comments and CardBot will reply with a link to the card! More info here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They're intending for Magic to go the way of Lego. A bunch of different IPs in the mix and you'll only engage with the sets you choose. If that's only UW sets, they're ok with that. For every one person that says they're going to quit because of UB cards/sets, there's likely 3-5 people that are picking up the game for the same reason.
The unfortunate side of this is that you don't get left out of competitive Lego if you decide to not engage with a set.
It's a business first, so someone has done the math to make sure that this kind of risk is worth it. Starting with Secret Lairs (Walking Dead) was a genius way to test the idea. Same goes for everything else they've done recently, new foil types, serialized cards, etc. They wouldn't do that stuff if it didn't make them money.
I'm not advocating in favor of this kind of behavior, but it's the reality of how product development works. You ship, test, iterate and ship. As long as they project growth, even if it's at the expense of their most enfranchised players, they'll continue to do whatever is working. You just have to decide whether it's an environment you want to participate in.