United States | News & Politics

7300 readers

723 users here now

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

San Jose council member granted restraining order against transphobic Instagramer (www.advocate.com)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

An elected official in California has been temporarily shielded from attacks by a right-wing extremist. San Jose City Councilmember Peter Ortiz recently obtained a restraining order against Robert Saenz, the owner of a popular Instagram page called “ESSJ Times.”

The action comes in response to Saenz’s posts on the social media platform, which Ortiz says have put him and his girlfriend in danger and has incited hateful messaging toward the LGBTQ+ community, The Mercury Newsreports.

The “ESSJ Times” Instagram account, with more than 66,000 followers, features content about crime and public safety in San Jose. Recently, Saenz began to obsessively post transphobic content, including controversial material regarding medical treatment for transgender children. He used the term “groomer” in these posts, a term that falsely associates legitimate medical care for transgender youth with child abuse and fosters violence against the LGBTQ+ community. The account also spread propaganda from the extremist group Gays Against Groomers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] aelwero -16 points 11 months ago (8 children)

Do I understand this correctly, that a court order states that one party can't post on their own social media about some other party, because a random third party might see the post and do the stupid?

A judge actually blessed off on this?

There's more to this, right?

[–] Cogency 18 points 11 months ago (5 children)

For those in the back, a right to free speech does not include the right to incite others to acts of terrorism.

This government official and his partner are being harassed because he supports the rights of trans individuals to make a private medical decision.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Could you imagine saying you live in the land of the free and meaning that the government gets to decide who you love and what medical procedures you’re allowed to have?

[–] aelwero -4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Or who you can post about on instatwittafuckbook?

How the fuck do you not understand this? I'd the narrative seriously more important than logic?

The seriously fucky part of this for me is that I'm way the hell on your side of the scale on both LGBTQ and abortion issues... Liberals want individual liberty on both counts, and I'm libertarian. But here I am telling you you can't be gay or get an abortion because I said the first amendment matters... I feel totally included in the "inclusive" party...

Y'all are getting to be about as fun to interact with as the maga fuckers...

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 2 points 11 months ago

I'm not worried if you think I'm fun to interact with because I've seen what makes libertarians cheer.

Restraining orders have happened for similar reasons before but I'd be interested if any civil rights lawyer would touch this case.

My gut feeling is it's an actions have consequences situation.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (4 replies)