this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
99 points (99.0% liked)

Games

16950 readers
638 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SandmanXC -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This feels like the worst of both worlds. The whole ai "pitch" for the masses is that it can help small devs with no, say, art skills. This just ensures the corpos have free reign to do whatever they want.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, it ensures that artists get paid for their work. If you can't afford an artist, either don't make a game or use free assets.

[–] SandmanXC 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It only ensures Ubisoft will build/buy a model they own and fire artists just as well. I fully agree with artists needing to get payed, but this to me feels like it's giving big players a "free pass", and they're the ones that will deal the most damage.