this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
210 points (90.1% liked)

The Agora

1598 readers
2 users here now

In the spirit of the Ancient Greek Agora, we invite you to join our vibrant community - a contemporary meeting place for the exchange of ideas, inspired by the practices of old. Just as the Agora served as the heart of public life in Ancient Athens, our platform is designed to be the epicenter of meaningful discussion and thought-provoking dialogue.

Here, you are encouraged to speak your mind, share your insights, and engage in stimulating discussions. This is your opportunity to shape and influence our collective journey, just like the free citizens of Athens who gathered at the Agora to make significant decisions that impacted their society.

You're not alone in your quest for knowledge and understanding. In this community, you'll find support from like-minded individuals who, like you, are eager to explore new perspectives, challenge their preconceptions, and grow intellectually.

Remember, every voice matters and your contribution can make a difference. We believe that through open dialogue, mutual respect, and a shared commitment to discovery, we can foster a community that embodies the democratic spirit of the Agora in our modern world.

Community guidelines
New posts should begin with one of the following:

Only moderators may create a [Vote] post.

Voting History & Results

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Exploding-heads.com is another instance on Lemmy where alt-right MAGA types tend to reside. Some people on this server want us to defederate from them immediately, some people want to save defederation as a last resort. They have 104 active users (more stats below).

It seems that exploding-heads has also experienced a recent botswarm invasion. This is obviously another point in favor of defederating them, assuming you are worried about botswarms, which is currently being discussed here.

My advice to you all is please try to discuss this in a civil manner, we need not allow them to create divisive conflict inside our communities. No matter how the vote turns out, you're not going to be able to defederate from your fellow sh.itheads so be nice.

I've linked many of the previous discussions below so people who are out of the loop can get a general sense of the situation.

https://sh.itjust.works/post/216888 https://sh.itjust.works/post/225714 https://sh.itjust.works/post/281126 https://sh.itjust.works/post/410325

Lemmy.world just recently defederated them.

https://lemmy.world/post/747912

https://lemmy.world/post/577526

Although this could be considered a point in favor of defederation, it actually means even if we vote to remain federated, people have a great alternative in lemmy.world where they can still participate in our communities and simultaneously be protected from exploding-heads.

Ensuring diversity of servers is beneficial to the platform as a whole, but it is also not our responsibility to bear that burden.

TLDR, just wrap up any last points in this thread before we open the vote tomorrow. Please be civil.

EDIT: To clarify, this isn't the official vote, this is the final discussion. The vote thread will be posted tomorrow and you will only be allowed to make a single comment saying Aye or Nay.

EDIT2: Vote thread is up, this thread is now locked. Very lively discussion thread sh.itheads. Please try to be more respectful next time.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

for the purpose of political extremism/radicalization

How do you define that?

Many people consider their opponents to be political extremists. Many on the right wing would argue that BLM protesters were political extremists. They had confrontations with police, there was some destruction of property at BLM protests. Or, what about the protests / riots in France over pensions? Or the convoy protests in Ottawa, Canada?

In my mind there's a definite difference between BLM protests and say the Jan 6 insurrection, but it would be really hard to find an objective definition that included the "good" radical protests and excluded the "bad" ones.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do you define that?

They literally included it in the second part of the sentence you left out

to include rampant bigotry, racism, sexism, calls to violence.

Or, what about the protests / riots in France over pensions? Or the convoy protests in Ottawa, Canada?

You're literally "whatabouting" this, no need put strawmen in here

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You don't seem to know what "whatabouting" means.

Yes, I'm asking whether riots in France or BLM protests count as political extremism. Does rampant bigotry against pro-life protesters count?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"good is a point of view" --Darth Sidious.

For the purposes of this discussion I'm deliberately not picking sides; "Let's go kill some of our political opponents" has no place on this platform.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The bar was set at "rampant bigotry", not "let's go kill some of our political opponents".

Does rampant bigotry against billionaires count?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you can't advocate for killing billionaires on this platform I'm really not interested in it. How are we supposed to solve any of our problems without violent uprising? That advocates that we keep living in this shitty status quo forever.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Angy upvote. But the violent uprisings were rarely successful, mostly because the new leaders would just be violent again. Realising better ideas is successful.