this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
-28 points (13.2% liked)

Conservative

430 readers
55 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

These are the stupid ideas the Democrats come up with. There are three billionaires in Oregon. Three. If this passes I suspect they will just move.

At the federal level, this would be unconstitutional.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Stupid democrat idea: tax people that won't even feel it, vs. stupid republican idea:

https://taxjustice.net/faq/does-cutting-taxes-boost-the-economy/ "Does cutting taxes boost the economy and lead to more taxes? Cutting taxes does not boost economic growth nor lead to more taxes being collected. The notion that it does, known as the Laffer Curve hypothesis, has been widely discredited. Late President George H.W. Bush described the hypothesis as “voodoo economics”.

The Laffer Curve – named after economist Arthur Laffer who drew his theory in the form of a graph on the back of a napkin for Dick Cheney, who would later become U.S. Vice-President and popularise the hypothesis – predicts that cutting taxes ultimately increases tax revenues by creating an explosion of economic dynamism and reduces tax avoidance."

It's been tried for years and it hasn't worked. It doesn't work. The only people who benefit from lower taxes are the crooks who keep calling for more tax cuts.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

After every tax cut we see an increase in revenue.

So yes, it does work.

Can you show the math where it doesn’t ?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

The article is misstating the Laffer curve but considering it is coming for a left site I am not surprised. The Laffer curve isn't as simple as cut taxes and revenue will increase.

It is about finding the right place for taxes to increase the revenue.

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/laffercurve.asp

Maybe instead of citing a lefty site, you should actually read what it is.

It suggests that taxes could be too low or too high to produce maximum revenue and both a 0% income tax rate and a 100% income tax rate generate $0 in receipts.

It's why it's a curve and not a line.