this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
365 points (98.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43958 readers
1543 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And tell me how proud of it you are.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Figureinplastic 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's a nice turn table and you should be happy to have it. But, it is definitely not better than any deck you can get today.

[โ€“] FireWire400 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Figureinplastic 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Rega Planar series, for sure. They are pricey, though. I'd hazard that there are some Pro-ject models that are likely superior at a lower price point than the Rega's.

Again, nothing against yours, it's a good one. But there's almost always something better, and in this case that holds true.

[โ€“] FireWire400 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, Rega turntables are pretty highly regarded but I doubt they're better than my Technics (direct drive vs. belt drive pretty much). Rega doesn't list specifications like wow & flutter or rumble on their page as far as I know which makes them kinda hard to compare, though.

Edit: Just had a look at a Pro-Ject deck (the classic evo, which is $1,999) and both the wow & flutter (0.11%) and the rumble (-70db) are worse than my Technics (0.03% and -73db).

They're still really good specs but on paper they're worse than those of the SL-1900.